Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-07-31

RAJ PAL SHARMA vs PRITAM DEVI (DECEASED) & ORS

Citation / case number
CM(M)-686/2019 2025:DHC:6371
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
RAJ PAL SHARMA
Respondent
PRITAM DEVI (DECEASED) & ORS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 31st July, 2025 CM(M) 686/2019 & CM APPL. 31170/2025 RAJ PAL SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajeshwar Kr. Gupta with Ms. Chauhan, Advocates. versus PRITAM DEVI (DECEASED) & ORS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Avinash Lakhanpal, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. The matter has a chequered history. 2. A suit was filed by the petitioner herein way back in the year 2011 seeking Declaration, Cancellation of Gift Deed and for Injunction. 3. During the pendency of the abovesaid suit, an application was moved by defendant No. 5 under Order VII Rule 11 CPC whereby he contended that the suit had not been properly valued for the purposes of Court Fee and that the plaintiff should have valued his suit at Rs, 1,00,00,000/- and should have also paid ad valorem Court Fee on the said amount. 4. After hearing both the sides, learned Trial Court allowed such application of the defendant No.5 vide order dated 01.07.2017 and while observing that the suit had not been properly valued and the requisite court fee had not been paid, simultaneously, granted time of 12 days to the plaintiff to properly value