RAHUL vs STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 18.07.2025 CRL.M.C. 3510/2025 RAHUL .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Kanika Vohra, Advocate with petitioner in person versus STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP for the State with SI Rekha Chauhan, PS Kalindi Kunj Mr. Shaurya Kapoor, Advocate for R- 2 and 3 with R-2 & 3 in person CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No. 733/2023 of PS Pandav Nagar for offences under Section 363/376/366 IPC and Section 6 of POCSO Act on the ground that the prosecutrix (respondent no. 3) and her father (respondent no. 2) have compromised the disputes with petitioner. The petitioner and respondents no. 2 and 3 are present in Court, identified by IO/SI Rekha Chauhan. 2. I have spoken with respondents no. 2 and 3 in Hindi. CRL.M.C. 3510/2025 pages GIRISH 3. It appears that the missing complaint qua respondent no.3 lodged by respondent no. 2 was registered as the impugned FIR and later it was found that respondent no. 3 got married with petitioner. Now, petitioner and respondent no. 3 are living together and also have a daughter aged about one year. 4. Re