RAHUL VERMA vs DELHI CANTONMENT BOARD

Judgment text excerpt

$~76 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 11th July, 2025 + W.P.(C) 9675/2025 & CM APPL. 40627/2025, CM APPL. 40628/2025 RAHUL VERMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anshuman, Mr. Rohan Mandal, Mr. Mohit, Mr. Piyush Ahluwalia, Advocates (M:9818571429) Email:[email protected] versus DELHI CANTONMENT BOARD .....Respondent Through: Mr. Tarveen Singh Nanda, Mr. Ankur Mishra, Advocates (M:9899703768) CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA MINI PUSHKARNA, J (ORAL): 1. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the impugned Notice dated 10th June, 2025, issued by the respondent, i.e., Delhi Cantonment Board, to the petitioner. 2. There is a further prayer for directions to respondent to consider the representation dated 18th June, 2025 of the petitioner, by giving personal hearing to the petitioner, whereby, the petitioner has expressed his willingness for the renewal or execution of fresh lease, on mutually Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed W.P.(C) 9675/2025 Page 1 of 6 By:HARIOM Signing Date:12.07.2025 20:24:21 agreeable terms. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the lawful occupier of the shop bearing no. S-2, admeasuring 14.70 sq. meters situated at Kalpatru Commercial Complex, Survey No. 49/13, Sadar Bazar, Delhi Cantt. 4. It is submitted that originally, Dr. Jaspal Singh entered into a Lease Agreement dated 13th July, 1995, with the respondent-Delhi Cantonment Board, through which leasehold rights in respect of the said unit were granted to him for an initial period of ten years, with an option for renewing, available to the lessee for a total period of upto thirty years. 5. Subsequently, Dr. Jaspal Singh, transferred the leasehold right to one Shri Navender Singh Walia vide Sale Agree