PUSHPA @ BABY vs STATE & ANR.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on : 28.07.2025 CRL.M.C. 1129/2020 PUSHPA @ BABY .....Petitioner versus STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Mr. Jai Bansal and Mr. Abhishek Verma, Advs. For the Respondents : Mr. Raj Kumar, APP for the State Mr. Hitesh Kumar, Mr. Suraj Rawat, Ms. Sapna & Mr. Vikas Sharma, Advs. for R2 CORAM HON’BLE MR JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN JUDGMENT 1. The present petition is filed against the judgment dated 03.12.2019 (hereafter ‘impugned judgment’) passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (‘ASJ’), Saket Courts, New Delhi in CA No. 38/2019 whereby the appeal filed by Respondent No. 2 under Section 29 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (‘DV Act’) was allowed and the order dated 03.12.2018 passed by the learned Magistrate granting maintenance @4,000/- per month 2. As per the complaint filed by the petitioner under Section 12 of the DV Act, the marriage between the petitioner and Respondent No. 2 was solemnized on 18.02.2011 and one child was born out of the said wedlock. It is alleged that post the marriage of the petitioner, she was constantly subjected to to