Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-07-01

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 660 of 2025 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 660 of 2025 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 660 of 2025 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:36928-DB Court No. - 1 Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 660 of 2025 Petitioner :- Devendra Kumar Tiwari Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Housing And Urban Planning And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Raj Kumar Singh,Akhilesh Kumar Mishra,Kartikay Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ratnesh Chandra Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J. Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J. Sri Saurabh Yadav, Advocate, has filed his Vakalatnama on behalf the opposite parties no. 2 & 3(Lucknow Development Authority), which is taken on record. Heard Sri Raj Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Nishant Shukla, learned counsel for the State, Sri Saurabh Yadav, learned counsel for the Lucknow Development Authority and perused the record. Sri Nishant Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the State, on the basis of instructions, has stated that in so far as the complaint against causing damage to the standing Banyan/Peepal tree is concerned, the same is wholly misplaced as no such damage is either caused or threatened to be caused to the said tree. There is equally no application for cutting down the

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 660 of 2025 at Lucknow · Niyam