PRAVEEN KUMAR PANDEY vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS

Judgment text excerpt

$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9588/2025 and CM APPL. 40333/2025 PRAVEEN KUMAR PANDEY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ayush Tanwar for Mr. Amit Tiwari, CGSC, Mr. Shivam Sachdeva, GP, and Ms. Ayushi Srivastava, Advocates with Mr Ajaypal Law Officer CRPF, Mr Athurv Insp CRPF, Mr Ramniwas Yadav, CRPF CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL ORDER (ORAL) % 11.07.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J. 1. The petitioner seeks award for participation in anti insurgency activity. 2. Issue notice to show cause as to why rule nisi be not issued. 3. Mr. Ayush Tanwar appearing for Mr. Amit Tiwari, CGSC accepts notice and submits, on instructions, that the respondents are willing to treat the writ petition as a representation and pass a detailed and speaking order within a period of six weeks from today. Signature Not Verified W.P.(C) 9588/2025 Digitally Signed By:AJIT Page 1 of 2 KUMAR Signing Date:14.07.2025 16:28:33 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner is agreeable to the suggestion. 5. Accordingly, we dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondents to treat the writ petition as a representation and pass a detailed and speaking order thereon within a period of six weeks from today. The decision as and when taken would be communicated to the petitioner forthwith. 6. The writ petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. C. HARI SHANKAR, J. AJAY DIGPAUL, J. JULY 11, 2025/yg Signature Not Verified W.P.(C) 9588/2025 Digitally Signed By:AJIT Page 2 of 2 KUMAR Signing Date:14.07.2025 16:28:33