PRAMOD KUMAR vs STATE N.C.T OF DELHI

Judgment text excerpt

$~80 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 18.07.2025 + CRL.REV.P. 109/2025 PRAMOD KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Petitioner is present through CJ-02, Tihar through vc Mr. Adv. (appearance not given) versus STATE N.C.T OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP for the State with ASI Om Prakash, P.S.Sarai Rohilla. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA JUDGMENT (ORAL) RAVINDER DUDEJA, J. CRL.M.A. 9423/2025 DELAY 8 DAYS IN FILING OF PETITION. Bearing in mind the reasons explained in the application, delay of 8 days in filing the petition is condoned. The application stands disposed of. CRL.REV.P. 109/2025 & CRL.M.A. 9424/2025 STAY 1. Revisionist has filed the revision petition seeking to set aside the order dated 12.12.2024, passed by the learned Additional Sessions CRL. REV.P.109/2025 Page 1 of 4 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:VAISHALI PRUTHI Signing Date:19.07.2025 13:22:48 Judge, Central as well as the judgment dated 23.12.2019, passed by learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Central. 2. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 08.07.2008 at about 5.00 am, truck bearing No. HR38-3960, driven by the revisionist in a rash and negligent manner, hit motorcycle bearing No. DL8S-AN- 2883 from behind, thereby, causing injuries to Om Prakash and Neelam, whereas, Saroj was dragged by the truck and she died at the spot. 3. FIR bearing No. 168/2008 was registered at Police Station Sarai Rohilla and upon completion of investigation, charge sheet was filed against the revisionist. After compliance of Section 207 Cr. PC, charges under Section 279/3378/304-A IPC and under Section 3/181 M.V. Act were framed against the revisionist. Revisionist pleaded not guilty and claimed trial. 4. Vide judgment dated 23.12.2019, revisionist