PRAKASH CHAND vs BAHADUR SINGH

Judgment text excerpt

$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 11.07.2025 + C.R.P. 149/2016 & CM APPL. 33680/2016 PRAKASH CHAND .....Petitioner Through: None. versus BAHADUR SINGH .....Respondent Through: Mr. Praveen Suri, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral) 1. None appears on behalf of the Petitioner. 2. Learned Counsel for the Respondent draws the attention of the Court to the order dated 28.02.2025 to submit that the matter has been pending since the year 2016 and the Petitioner has repeatedly requested for adjournments. 3. It is stated therein that on the last date as well, none appeared on behalf of the Petitioner and a final opportunity was granted to the Petitioner to address arguments on payment of costs of Rs. 10,000/- to the Respondent. 4. The Petitioner is not present today as well. 5. The report of the Registry is that proof of costs has not been placed on record. 6. The record reflects that multiple adjournments have been taken by the Petitioner. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:RAHUL Signing Date:12.07.2025 CRP 149/2016 Page 1 of 2 04:54:27 7. Accordingly, the Petition is dismissed in default and for non- prosecution. Pending Application stands closed. 8. The parties will act based on the digitally signed copy of the order. TARA VITASTA GANJU, J JULY 11, 2025/pa Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:RAHUL Signing Date:12.07.2025 CRP 149/2016 Page 2 of 2 04:54:27