PAWAN KUMAR SINGH vs THE STATE N.C.T. OF DELHI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 25.07.2025 + BAIL APPLN. 2738/2025 & CRL.M.A. 21355/2025 PAWAN KUMAR SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Surender Yadav, Advocate. versus THE STATE N.C.T. OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP for State with SI Amit Sehrawat CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The accused/applicant seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 491/2025 of PS S.P. Badli for offences under Section 110/115(2)/126(2)/3(5) of BNS. I have heard learned counsel for the accused/applicant and learned APP for State. 2. On behalf of accused/applicant, it is argued that for the same incident, FIR No.491/2025 was registered after registration of Kalandra under Section 126/170 BNSS, therefore, the genuineness of the FIR is suspect. It is further submitted by learned counsel for accused/applicant that on account of his examinations, the accused/applicant could not join investigation. Learned counsel for accused/applicant submits that co-accused persons have already been granted bail. BAIL APPLN. 2738/2025 pages GIRISH 3. Learned APP for State accompanied with Investigating Officer/SI Amit Sehrawat accepts notice and su