PANKAJ PANDEY @ ASHUTOSH PANDEY vs STATE OF (NCT OF DELHI ) AND ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~74 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 18.07.2025 + CRL.M.C. 2680/2025 PANKAJ PANDEY @ ASHUTOSH PANDEY.....Petitioners Through: Mr. Sandeep Kr. Mishra, Adv. along with petitioner in person. versus STATE OF (NCT) OF DELHI & ANR … Respondents Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP for the State with SI Sachin Kumar, PS Amar Colony Mr. Suresh Chandra Sharma, Adv. for R-2 along with R-2 in person. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA JUDGMENT(ORAL) RAVINDER DUDEJA, J. 1. This is a petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, seeking quashing of FIR No. 522/2017, dated 14.11.2017, registered at P.S Amar Colony, Delhi under Sections 354D/506 IPC and all proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of settlement between the parties. 2. As per allegations in the FIR, petitioner used to harass respondent no. 2 and make phone calls using filthy language. He threatened to kill her and not allow her to get her married and also threatened to kill her husband too. He also used to call her would be CRL.M.C. 2680/2025 Page 1 of 4 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:VAISHALI PRUTHI Signing Date:19.07.2025 11:08:13 husband from new numbers and threatened to kill her family. He also sent messages on the Facebook ID and SMS of respondent no. 2. Upon the complaint of respondent no. 2, FIR no. 522/2017 was registered under Section 354D/506 IPC PS Amar Colony. Chargesheet has since been filed under Section 354D/506/509 IPC against the petitioner. 3. The learned APP states that charges have been framed only under Section 354D/506 IPC. 4. During the proceedings, the parties amicably resolved their disputes and in view of the same, both parties have filed their respective affidavits dated 30.01.2025 and 01.02.2025. 5. Parties are physical