Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-07-28

PANKAJ JAIN vs PARUL JAIN

Citation / case number
MAT.APP.(F.C.)-264/2025 2025:DHC:6077-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
PANKAJ JAIN
Respondent
PARUL JAIN

Judgment text excerpt

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on: 22.07.2025 Judgment pronounced on: 28.07.2025 + MAT. APP. (F.C.) 264/2025& CM APPL. 43584/2025 PANKAJ JAIN .....Appellant Through: Appellant in-person versus PARUL JAIN .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR JUDGMENT ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. 1. The present Appeal has been filed under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 [hereinafter referred to as “HMA”] read with Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 seeking to challenge the Order dated 29.03.2025 [hereinafter referred to as “Impugned Order”] passed by the learned Judge, Family Court-01, West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as the “Family Court”] in HMA No. 1089/2018 titled Parul Jain v. Pankaj Jain, whereby the Appellant’s application dated 17.08.2021 under Section 22 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 seeking injunctive relief against the Respondent, her brother, and her employer from disclosing or disseminating details of the matrimonial litigation and related custody Signature Not Verified Signed By:JAI NARAYAN MAT. APP. (F.C.) 264/2025 Page 1 of 8 Signing Date:28.07.2025 15:04:35 proceedings, was dismissed. 2. The brief facts in which the present Appeal arises pertain to the marriage between the parties, solemnized on 22.04.2006 according to the Hindu rites and ceremonies in Delhi. Out of the said wedlock, a girl child was born on 11.02.2013. Thereafter, matrimonial discord arose between the parties, and multiple proceedings came to be instituted, including the institution of HMA No. 1089/2018 by the Respondent-wife seeking dissolution of marriage. 3. During the pendency of the said proceedings, the Appellant filed four separate applic

PANKAJ JAIN vs PARUL JAIN · Niyam