Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-07-17

NITIN AND ANOTHER vs THE STATE AND ANOTHER

Citation / case number
CRL.M.C.-3848/2025 2025:DHC:5720
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
NITIN AND ANOTHER
Respondent
THE STATE AND ANOTHER
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 17.07.2025 CRL.M.C. 3848/2025 & CRL.M.A. 16842/2025 NITIN AND ANOTHER .....Petitioners Through: Counsel for petitioners (appearance not given) with petitioners in person. versus THE STATE AND ANOTHER .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP for the State with SI Pankaj Kumar, PS Jyoti Nagar Mr. Jyoti Bhardwaj, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.112/2017 of PS Jyoti Nagar, Delhi for offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC & 3/4 DP Act on the ground that complainant de facto (respondent no.2) has settled the disputes with the petitioners. 2. Learned APP for the State and respondent no. 2 in person (identified by IO/SI Pankaj Kumar) accept notice. State has no serious objection to this petition. CRL.M.C.3848/2025 pages 3. Petitioners and respondent no. 2 are present in Court and I have spoken with them in Hindi. It is submitted by them that petitioner no. 1 and respondent no. 2 have resolved their matrimonial dispute and are now living together happily for about two years. They also now have a son currently aged about 10 mo