NISHEETH KOHLI vs SONAL MALIK

Judgment text excerpt

$~61 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4845/2025, CRL.M.A. 21003/2025 & CRL.M.A. 21004/2025 NISHEETH KOHLI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Randhir Kumar, Mr. Amit Kumar and Ms. Khushboo Sharma, Advs. versus SONAL MALIK .....Respondent Through: Mr. Prateek Goswami, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL ORDER % 22.07.2025 AJAY DIGPAUL, J. 1. By way of the present petition, the petitioner seeks to set aside orders dated 01.11.2023, 20.06.2024 and 23.10.2024, passed under Section 23 of Domestic Violence Act, 20051 by the Court of MM (Mahila Court)-01, North, District Court, Rohini, Delhi in Ct. Case No. 55/2017 titled Sonal Malik @ Sonal Kohli v. Nisheeth Kohli & Ors. 2. At the outset, Mr. Prateek Goswami, learned Counsel for the respondent submits that the present petition is not maintainable under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 428 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (“BNSS”), as the impugned orders dated 1 “The Act”, hereinafter Signature Not Verified Signed By:AAKANSHA CRL.M.C. 4845/2025 Page 1 of 2 SHARMA Signing Date:24.07.2025 13:48:08 01.11.2023, 20.06.2024 and 23.10.2024 are challengeable only under the specific provision of the Act. 3. Section 29 of the Act prescribes appeal which reads thus: “29. Appeal.—There shall lie an appeal to the Court of Session within thirty days from the date on which the order made by the Magistrate is served on the aggrieved person or the respondent, as the case may be, whichever is later.” 4. At this stage, learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition and approach the concerned court by availing the remedy under Section 29 of the Act. 5. Accordingly, leave is granted and the petitioner is at liberty to approach the concerned court in accordance with the