NEERAJ JAIN vs TEHSIN & ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 09.07.2025 CM(M) 1166/2025 NEERAJ JAIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Srivastava, Ms. Akanksha and Ms. Uzma, Advocates versus TEHSIN & ORS. .....Respondents Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral) 1. This Court by an Order dated 08.07.2025, had passed the following directions: “3. The present Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [hereinafter referred to as “CPC”] impugning the award dated 27.01.2025 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, MACT (East) Karkardooma Courts, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “Impugned Award”]. By the Impugned Award, the learned Tribunal has dismissed the Application seeking pre-mature release of the FDRs issued in the name of the Petitioner. 4. None appears for the Petitioner despite the matter being called out twice today. 5. A review of the Impugned Award shows that the Petitioner has sought pre- mature release of the FDRs giving a ground that he is unemployed and has no source of income. The learned Tribunal has examined this matter and found that