Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-07-25

MUKESH MARWAHA vs HARISH SHARMA

Citation / case number
C.R.P.-212/2025 2025:DHC:6830
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
MUKESH MARWAHA
Respondent
HARISH SHARMA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 25.07.2025 C.R.P. 212/2025 & CM APPL. 44673/2025 MUKESH MARWAHA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shobhit Gupta, Adv. versus HARISH SHARMA .....Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral) CM APPL. 44673/2025 [Exemption from filing certified/typed copies] 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. 2. The Application stands disposed of. C.R.P. 212/2025 3. The present Petition has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [hereinafter referred to as “CPC”] against the order dated 17.04.2025 passed by learned Senior Civil Judge, West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “Impugned Order”]. By the Impugned Order, the Application under Order XII Rule 6 of the CPC has been dismissed by the learned Trial Court. 4. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner makes one submission. He submits that the Impugned Order has been wrongly passed as the admissions have been made which would entitle the Petitioner a judgment on the basis of admissions qua the decree for possession. 5. Briefly, the facts are that the Petitioner [Plai

MUKESH MARWAHA vs HARISH SHARMA · Niyam