Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-07-07

MS FIBERFILL ENGINEERS & ANR. vs MS RAMPUR ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED & ANR.

Citation / case number
C.R.P.-178/2022 2025:DHC:5389
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
MS FIBERFILL ENGINEERS & ANR.
Respondent
MS RAMPUR ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED & ANR.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 07.07.2025 C.R.P. 178/2022, CM APPL. 45084/2022 MS FIBERFILL ENGINEERS & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Amit Gupta and Ms. Muskan Nagpal, Advs. versus MS RAMPUR ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Praveen Mahajan and Mr. Ronakjeet Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral) 1. The present Petition has been filed under Section 115 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [hereinafter referred to as “CPC”] and under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugning the order dated 16.09.2022 passed by the learned Trial Court, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “Impugned Order”]. 2. Learned Counsel for the Respondents raises the issue of maintainability. He draws the attention of the Court to Section 8 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 [hereinafter referred to as the “CC Act”] to submit that the present Petition is barred by the provisions of Section 8 of the CC Act. 3. This Court agrees. Section 8 of the CC Act sets out that no civil revision petition shall be entertained against any interlocutory order.

MS FIBERFILL ENGINEERS & ANR. vs MS RAMPUR ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED & ANR. · Niyam