Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-07-18

MINOSHA INDIA LIMITED vs MR. DEEPAK TIWARI & ORS.

Citation / case number
C.R.P.-342/2023 2025:DHC:5820
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
MINOSHA INDIA LIMITED
Respondent
MR. DEEPAK TIWARI & ORS.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 18.07.2025 C.R.P. 342/2023 & CM APPL. 60467/2023 MINOSHA INDIA LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhimanyu Mahajan, Ms. Niyati Kohli, Mr. Pratham Vir Aggarwal, Ms. Anubha & Mr. Mayank, Advocates. versus MR. DEEPAK TIWARI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral) 1. The present Petition has been filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [hereinafter referred to as “CPC”] impugning the order dated 26.08.2023 passed by the learned District Judge (Commercial Court)-02, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “Impugned Order”]. 2. The attention of the learned Counsel for the Petitioners is drawn to the provisions of Section 8 of the CC Act, which sets out that no civil revision petition shall be entertained against an interlocutory order passed by the Commercial Courts. It is apposite to set out Section 8 of the CC Act below: “8. Bar against revision application or petition against an interlocutory order.—Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, no civil revision ap