MD ARAM vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Delivered on: 09.07.2025 + W.P.(C) 10462/2024 MD ARAM .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohd. Azam Ansari, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ashok Kumar, Adv. for R- 2/CBSE. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN JUDGMENT VIKAS MAHAJAN, J W.P.(C) 10462/2024 & CM APPL. 36857/2025 (for permission to appear as a private candidate in the supplementary exam) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking following relief: “(A) Issue a writ of certiorari and quash and set aside CBSE order bearing reference no. CBSE /ROD/ Legal/2024/1330 dated 25.06.2024 and declare the petitioner as passed in his Class-12 Board examination as per Rule 40.1 (i) of Examination Bye Laws reproduced in Ground A of this writ petition which reads as under for kind perusal:- (i) A candidate will be eligible to get the Pass Certificate of the Board, if he/she gets a grade higher than E in all subjects of internal assessment unless he/she is exempted. Failing this, result of the external examination will be withheld but not for a period of more than one year. (B) Quash Rule 40.1 (ii) of Examination Bye Laws being Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:DEEPAK SINGH W.P.(C) 10462/2024 Page 1 of 9 Signing Date:09.07.2025 12:15:00 contradictory to rule 40.1(i) reproduced above and direct respondents to declare petitioner passed in his class-12 board exam as petitioner has obtained minimum 33% marks in all his six papers including in additional 6th subject in both theory & practical combined together and also quash their reevaluation order in History and award at least 10 marks in History as zero marks cannot be given for four attempted questions for which 12 marks claimed. Or, In the alterna