MANNU KAUSHIK & ORS. vs TEH STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~70 & 71 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 25.07.2025 + CRL.M.C. 4215/2025 MANNU KAUSHIK & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Akshay Mahajan, Advocate versus TEH STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for the State Mr. Narendra Singh, Advocate for R-2 + CRL.M.C. 4216/2025 MOHAN LAL GAUR & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Narendra Singh, Advocate versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP for the State Mr. Akshay Mahajan, Advocate for R-2 CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. Petitioners seek quashing of cross FIRs No. 451/2017 of Police Station Keshav Puram, New Delhi for offence under Section 323/341/452/506/34 IPC and FIR No. 452/2017 of Police Station Keshav Puram, New Delhi for offence under Section 308/324/341/34 IPC. 2. The quashing is sought on the ground that parties have compromised the disputes with each other. Statements of parties were recorded by the CRL.M.C. 4215/2025 & 4216/2025 Page 1 of 2 pages Digitally signed by GIRISH Signature Not Verified GIRISH KATHPALIA KATHPALIA Date: 2025.07.25 17:49:36 +05'30' Digitally Signed By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:25.07.2025 18:14:06 concerned Joint Registrar. 3. Broadly speaking, on the issue of taking over Navyuvak Brahmin Samaj, two groups assaulted each other, causing multiple injuries to each other. In the alleged incident, one of them also lost consciousness and was taken to hospital. Both groups, in the incident threatened to kill each other. 4. Learned APP submits that State has no objection to these petitions keeping in mind permanent quietus as the petitioners are residents of same area. 5. I have examined both FIRs as well as MLCs of injured persons. 6. Considering the over