M/S V.G. WEAVING PRIVATE LIMITED FORMERLY KNOWN AS M/S SHEENA WEAVING PVT. LTD & ANR. vs M/S HAWK CAPITAL PRIVATE LTD

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 11.07.2025 CRL.M.C. 4501/2025 & CRL.M.A. 19639/2025, 19640/2025 & CRL.M.A. 19638/2025 (stay) M/S V.G. WEAVING PRIVATE LIMITED FORMERLY KNOWN AS M/S SHEENA WEAVING PVT. LTD & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Sarika Jetly, Advocate versus M/S HAWK CAPITAL PRIVATE LTD .....Respondent Through: Ms. Devika Mohan, Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The petitioners have assailed order dated 22.05.2025 passed by the Court of Sessions, dismissing the revision petition filed by them. 2. I heard the learned counsel for petitioners at length, but in the end, it is counsel for respondent who disclosed that final arguments in the trial proceedings have already been concluded and matter has been reserved for judgment. To say the least, such conduct on the part of counsel for petitioners has to be deprecated. For, fairness as a counsel was that at the beginning itself, learned counsel for the petitioners should have disclosed that final arguments have already been concluded and the trial matter has been adjourned for pronouncement of judgment. CRL.M.C. 4501/2025 pages 3. Broadly speaking, the circumstances g