Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-07-29

M/S REGENT AUTOMOBILES LTD. vs RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE

Citation / case number
CM(M)-968/2021 2025:DHC:6313
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
M/S REGENT AUTOMOBILES LTD.
Respondent
RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 29.07.2025 CM(M) 968/2021, CM APPL. 39012/2021 & CM APPL. 45547/2025 M/S REGENT AUTOMOBILES LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nimish Chib, Mr. Vartul Vishnoi & Mr. Chetan Silotia, Advocates. versus RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rajeev M. Roy, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral) 1. The present Petition has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 01.03.2021 passed by learned Presiding Officer, MACT, South District, Saket Courts, New Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “Impugned Order”]. By the Impugned Order, an Application filed under Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [hereinafter referred to as “CPC”] filed by the Petitioner seeking to set aside an Award, which has been dismissed by the learned Tribunal. 2. At the outset, learned Counsel for the Respondent submits that the present Petition is not maintainable under the provisions of Article 227 of the Constitution, 1950 and that only an appeal is maintainable. Learned 3. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner clarifi