Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-07-23

LALIT KUMAR @ NANDI vs STATE (GNCT OF DELHI)

Citation / case number
BAIL APPLN.-1596/2025 2025:DHC:6018
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
LALIT KUMAR @ NANDI
Respondent
STATE (GNCT OF DELHI)

Judgment text excerpt

$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 23rd July, 2025 + BAIL APPLN. 1596/2025 LALIT KUMAR @ NANDI S/o Prem Singh R/o H.No.J-453, Dakshin Puri, Dr. Ambedkar Nagar, Sector 5, New Delhi, Delhi-110062. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vidur Mohan and Ms. Prachi Batra, Advocates. versus STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP for the State with SI Rajesh, PS Ambedkar Nagar. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. A Bail Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. of BNSS read with Section 582 of BNSS has been filed on behalf of the Applicant Lalit Kumar @ Nandi for grant of Anticipatory Bail in case FIR No.566/24 under Section 109(1)/110/115(2)/333/3(5) registered at Police Station Ambedkar Nagar, Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed BAIL APPLN. 1596/2025 Page 1 of 7 By:VIKAS ARORA Signing Date:24.07.2025 17:47:05 Delhi. 2. It is submitted that the Applicant is 55 years old and working as Lab Assistant in a Government Hospital and has been falsely implicated in this case. The contents of the FIR are vague and do not disclose any offence against the Applicant. He has already joined investigations twice in terms of Order dated 27.02.2025 and 10.03.2025 and has fully cooperated in the investigations. 3. The Applicant had filed for Anticipatory Bail before the learned District & Sessions Judge on 26.02.2025, whereby he was granted interim protection on 27.02.2025. Thereafter, he had joined the investigations on 05.04.2025 and again on 14.04.2025. The I.O in his reply dated 17.04.2025 had stated that the Applicant had not brought any stick separately but had used the stick of the co-accused for allegedly giving beatings to the Complainant. He further had stated that no stick is required t

LALIT KUMAR @ NANDI vs STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) · Niyam