Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-07-16

KOTHARI SHAILESHBHAI RAMANLAL HUF vs SAMAKSH JAIN & ANR.

Citation / case number
CM(M)-1160/2025 2025:DHC:5753
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
KOTHARI SHAILESHBHAI RAMANLAL HUF
Respondent
SAMAKSH JAIN & ANR.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 16th July, 2025 CM(M) 1160/2025 & CM APPL. 39132-39133/2025 KOTHARI SHAILESHBHAI RAMANLAL HUF .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shashank Khurana, Mr. Deepak Verma and Mr. Abheesht Sharma, Advocates versus SAMAKSH JAIN & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Prateek Goswami, Mr. Shashank Garg, Ms. Shubhika and Ms. Manju Dahiya, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. When the present petition was taken up on 07.07.2025, the following order was passed: - “1. The present petition has been filed by the defendant /counter- claimant. 2. Since, the concerned defendant/counter-claimant, who is residing in Ahmedabad, was stated to be an aged person and on account of his ill-health, he was not permitted to travel to Delhi, on the basis of the application moved by the defendant/counter-claimant, a Local Commissioner was appointed. 3. Reference in this regard be made to the order dated 5th April, 2025. 4. However, before the Commission could be executed, an application was moved seeking modification of said order and the petitioner wanted some reduction in fee fixed by the learned Trial Court towards said commis