KABUSHIKI KAISHA TOYOTA JIDOSHOKKI vs LMW LIMITED

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: May 15, 2025 % Pronounced on: July 01, 2025 + CS(COMM) 881/2024 KABUSHIKI KAISHA TOYOTA JIDOSHOKKI .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. C.M. Lall, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Pravin Anand, Ms. Archana Shanker, Mr. Sagar Arora, Ms. Annanya Mehan and Mr. Ashutosh Upadhyaya, Advs. Versus LMW LIMITED .…Defendant Through: Mr. Gaurav Pachnanda, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Vineet Rohilla, Mr. Pankaj Soni, Mr. Debashish Banerjee, Mr. Ankush Verma, Mr. Rohit Rangi and Ms. Namrata Sinha, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE JUDGMENT I.A. 41600/2024 (for injunction) Preface: 1. Vide the present application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 19081, the plaintiff seeks an interim injunction against the defendant for restraining use of the impugned product Spinpact2 or any other product infringing its Indian Patent bearing no.IN2447593 titled as “FIBER BUNDLE CONCENTRATING 1 Hereinafter referred as ‘CPC’ 2 Hereinafter referred as ‘Spinpact’ 3 Hereinafter referred as ‘IN759’ I.A. 41600/2024 in CS(COMM) 881/2024 Page 1 of 23 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:BABLOO SHAH Signing Date:01.07.2025 17:21:19 APPARATUS IN SPINNING MACHINE” as also another Indian Patent bearing no.IN3948834 titled as “SUCTION DUCT FOR SPINNING MACHINE”, amongst other ancillary reliefs. 2. At the very outset, Mr. Chander M. Lall, learned senior counsel for the plaintiff upon instructions from Mr. Pravin Anand, learned counsel for the plaintiff submitted that for adjudication of the present application, at this stage, the plaintiff will not be pressing for any relief(s) in relation to IN883 in light of the statement made by the defendant in its written statement, particularly paragraph no.67 thereof, wherein the defendant has stated tha