Bombay High Court · 2025-07-24
JITENDRA NAMDEV DARAVKAR THROUGH HIS REAL BROTHER AND NEXT FRIEND PRADIP NAMDEV DARAVKAR vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Citation / case number
- WP/4055/2025
- Court
- Bombay High Court
- Petitioner
- JITENDRA NAMDEV DARAVKAR THROUGH HIS REAL BROTHER AND NEXT FRIEND PRADIP NAMDEV DARAVKAR
- Respondent
- STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Judgment text excerpt
903-WP-4055-2025-(CR).odt SUNNY Digitally signed by SUNNY ANKUSHRAO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ANKUSHRAO THOTE THOTE Date: 2025.07.25 11:36:31 +0530 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4055 OF 2025 Jitendra Namdev Daravkar Age. 38 yrs, Occ. Cable and Internet provider, R/at. Village Ghot, At. Post Koynavale, Tal. Panvel, Dist. Raigad, At presently lodged in Taloja Police Station Through his real brother & next friend Mr. Pradip Namdev Daravkar, Age : 45 years, Occ.: Business, R/at. Village Ghot, At. Post Koynavale, Tal. Panvel, Dist. Raigad, ...Petitioner Versus 1 The State of Maharashtra (Through Taloja Police Station) 2. Ajaykumar Ramvilas Sharma, Age : 40 yrs. Occu : Service, R/o. A-503, Smit CNS, Plot No.9, Sec-35, Kharghar, Tal. Panvel, Dist. Raigad ...Respondents Mr. Saurabh Bhutala i/by Mr. Harshad Sathe, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. S.V. Gavand, APP for Respondent No.1/State. Mr. Mayur Mohite a/w Mr. Jayesh Bhosale, Mr. Ganesh Shelar, Advocate for Respondent No.2. Mr. Sunil S. Gharat, PSI, Taloja Police Station, present. CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, JJ. DATE : 24th JULY, 2025 SUNNY THOTE 1 of 15 903-WP-4055-2025-(CR).odt ORAL JUDGMENT (Per : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , J) 1. When this matter was called out, the original Complainant approached the Court, contending that he has not been impleaded as a Respondent. He desires to contest this Petition. The learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits on instructions that he is willing to add him. Leave to add the Original Complainant as Respondent No.2. Addition be carried out forthwith. The learned Advocate, Mr. Mohite appears on behalf of the added Respondent No.2. 2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally, by the consent of the parties. 3. The Petit