INDER SINGH vs MEERA KUMARI & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 29th July, 2025 + RFA 39/2021 INDER SINGH .....Appellant Through: Mr. Mohit Kumar and Mr. D. K. Panchal, Advocates Mob: 9873624008 Email: [email protected] versus MEERA KUMARI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Vishakha and Mr. Jitender Singh, Advocates for Respondent nos. 1 to 3 Email: [email protected] Mob: 7838888619 Ms. Meenakshi Midha, Advocate for MCD Mob: 9810288545 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA MINI PUSHKARNA, J (ORAL): 1. The present appeal has been filed seeking to set aside the impugned judgment and preliminary decree of partition dated 14th May, 2019 and final decree dated 24th December, 2019 passed by the Court of Additional District Judge-01, South-West District, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi in Civil Suit No. 20/2012 (516704/2016). 2. A suit for partition, permanent and mandatory injunction had been filed by the respondents herein in District Court, Dwarka qua property bearing No. RZ-26-P/111, Part of Khasra No. 305, Indira Park, West Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed RFA 39/2021 Page 1 of 8 By:HARIOM SHARMA Signing Date:06.08.2025 09:40:34 Sagarpur, New Delhi-110046, measuring 62 sq. yds. Respondent no.1, who was plaintiff no.1 in the suit, is the wife of Late Bhura Singh @ Bhairo Singh, who was the younger brother of the appellant, i.e., Inder Singh. The suit was filed on the premise that Late Bhura Singh @ Bhairo Singh, husband of respondent no.1, had half share in the suit property along with Inder Singh, the appellant herein. 3. Issues were framed in the suit vide order dated 07th February, 2013, in the following manner: “xxx xxx xxx Issues 1. Whether the plaintiffs do not have any right, title or interest in the suit property, as they were given possession of ano