DR. ER. RAJAINDERR JAINA vs UNION OF INDIA & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~72 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 22.07.2025 + W.P.(C) 10426/2025 & CM Appl. 43295/2025 DR. ER. RAJAINDERR JAINA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajesh Aggarwal, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ashish K. Dixit, CGSC with Mr. Shivam Tiwari, Mr. Umar Hashmi, Ms. Urmila Shara and Ms. Venni Kakkar, Advs. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral) CM Appl. 43296/2025[Exemption from filing certified/fair typed copies] 1. Allowed, subject to the Petitioner filing certified/typed copies of the annexures within a period of three weeks. 2. The Application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 10426/2025 & CM Appl. 43295/2025[Stay] 3. The grievance of the Petitioner as articulated in the present Petition is that the Petitioner has made several complaints and representations to Respondent No.1 which are not being adjudicated upon by Respondent No.1. It is the case of the Petitioner that he has made complaints with respect to the Petitioner’s “fake resignation and removal of his name as a Director of Respondent No. 2 company” including on 05.04.2024, Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:GEETA JOSHI Signing Date:23.07.2025 W.P.(C) 10426/2025 Page 1 of 3 22:39:03 27.04.2024, 10.06.2024, 05.07.2024, 01.08.2024 and 14.06.2025. 4. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that his grievance would be satisfied if the present Petition be treated as a representation and a detailed speaking order be passed by the Respondent No.1 examining the contentions raised by him in the present Petition. 5. Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 1 submits that since the prayer in the present Petition is limited, the matter can be disposed of today itself. He further submits that in view of the order this Co