DEEPAK SHARMA vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 9490/2025 & CM APPL. 40054/2025 DEEPAK SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhay Kumar Bhargava, Mr. Satyaarth Sinha and Ms. Khushi, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Naginder Benipal, SPC, Ms Vidhi Gupta, GP, Mr. Ankit Siwach, Advocates with Mr Ajay Pal, Law Officer, CRPF, Mr Athurv, Inspector, CRPF and Mr. Ramniwas Yadav, CRPF CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL ORDER (ORAL) % 10.07.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J. 1. The petitioner challenges his transfer to Hyderabad. Amongst other contentions, he contends that his son is epileptic and is a student of Class 10. 2. The petitioner is also placing reliance on the judgment dated 9 August 2024 passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in WP (C) 11036/20241, in which, in similar circumstances, the Court had directed the writ petition to be treated as a representation and a 1 Dhirendra Singh v UOI 3. Accordingly, we dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondents to treat the writ petition as a representation and take a decision thereon within a period of four weeks from today. The decision, as and when