Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-07-31

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 13 of 2025 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL REVISION No. 13 of 2025 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL REVISION No. 13 of 2025 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:46199 AFR Court No. - 12 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 13 of 2025 Revisionist :- Anurag Pandey Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Amit Kumar Singh,Ajai Kumar Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Rohit Singh Parmar Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J. 1. Heard Shri Amit Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the revisionist, learned AGA and Shri Rohit Singh Parmar, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2. 2. This Criminal Revision has been filed assailing the judgment and order dated 30.07.2024 passed in Criminal Misc. Case No. 280 of 2023; Kumari Neha Pandey vs. Anurag Pandey under Section 125 of Criminal Procedure Code (here-in-after referred as CrPC) by Principal Judge, Family Court, District Sultanpur. 3. The sole argument advanced by learned counsel for the revisionist is that the respondent no. 2 is major in age and it was disclosed in the application under Section 125 CrPC itself, therefore, the maintenance could not have been allowed in the proceeding(s) under Section 125 CrPC and if the court was of the view that a major daughter can claim maintenance under Section 20(3) of Hindu

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 13 of 2025 at Lucknow · Niyam