Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-07-08

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 9910 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 9910 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 9910 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:107668 Court No. - 87 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9910 of 2025 Applicant :- Rajan Pahadi Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rajeev Chaddha Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Avnish Saxena,J. 1. Sri Rajeev Chaddha, Advocate appears and submits that the accused/applicant has been falsely implicated in G.T. No.252 of 2010, arising out of Case Crime No. 1555 of 2009, under Section 2/3 Gangster Act, Police Station Kotwali, District Gorakhpur. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant, contends that there is criminal history of ten cases against the accused-applicant, which is duly explained in the bail application as well as supplementary affidavit. The explanation of criminal history shows that in two cases, the accused is acquitted; in six cases bail has been granted; one case of Section 110 Cr.P.C. has been dropped and in one case, no charge sheet has been submitted. As such, he prays that the accused/applicant be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 4. This Court has taken into consideration the rival submissions made by learned

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 9910 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam