Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-07-03

COMMERCIAL APPEAL No. 2 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
COMMERCIAL APPEAL No. 2 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
COMMERCIAL APPEAL No. 2 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

1 Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:103318-DB AFR Reserved Chief Justice's Court (1) Case :- COMMERCIAL APPEAL No. - 2 of 2025 Appellant :- Reeta Chaddha (Deceased) and 2 others Respondent :- U.P. Jal Nigam and 9 others Counsel for Appellant :- Daya Shankar, Mahendra Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- Suresh Singh, Vimlesh Kumar Rai (2) Case :- COMMERCIAL APPEAL No. - 4 of 2025 Appellant :- Reeta Chaddha (Deceased) and 2 others Respondent :- U.P. Jal Nigam and 9 others Counsel for Appellant :- Daya Shankar, Mahendra Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- Suresh Singh, Vimlesh Kumar Rai Hon'ble Arun Bhansali, Chief Justice Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra, J. (Per: Arun Bhansali, CJ) 1. These appeals under Section 13(1A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 (for short ‘Act, 2015’) have been filed against the judgments/orders dated 05.09.2024 passed by Commercial Court, Prayagraj in Execution Case Nos. 33 of 2004 and 31 of 2004 arising out of arbitral awards dated 31.07.2002 passed by Sole Arbitrator, whereby the execution cases filed by the appellants have been rejected. 2. The facts indicated reveal that respondent-Jal Nigam invited tenders for reconstruction of RCC Overhead Tank, the co

COMMERCIAL APPEAL No. 2 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam