CHAMAN LAL vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS

Judgment text excerpt

$~112 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10487/2025 & CM APPLs. 43550/2025, 43551/2025 CHAMAN LAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nikhil Bhardwaj, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Balendu Shekhar CGSC, Mr. Krishna Chaitanya GP, Mr. Divyansh Singh Dev, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA ORDER (ORAL) % 22.07.2025 C.HARI SHANKAR, J. 1. The petitioner, who serves in the Sashastra Seema Bal1, was earlier transferred from Delhi to Balrampur, Uttar Pradesh. He assailed the said transfer before this Court by way of WP (C) 8884/20252. 2. It was pointed out, in the said petition, that the petitioner’s wife had donated a kidney to him, as a result of which the petitioner and his 1 “SSB” hereinafter 2 Chaman Lal v UOI W.P.(C) 10487/2025 Page 1 of 4 Signature Not Verified Signed By:GUNN Signing Date:28.07.2025 17:53:11 wife were both surviving with one kidney each and that his father was on dialysis and his daughter was studying in Class X. 3. The petitioner had represented against his transfer to Balrampur. However, the representation was rejected by an unreasoned order on 17 June 2025. 4. In these circumstances, this court, by its order dated 3 July 2025, disposed of WP (C) 8884/2025 with a direction to the respondents to treat the writ petition as a representation and to pass a reasoned and speaking order on the petitioner’s challenge to his transfer to Balrampur. 5. The respondent has, pursuant to our directions, passed an order on 17 July 2025. The order, clearly, is a reasoned order. 6. The order notes that, keeping in view the difficulties expressed by the petitioner, his transfer had been modified and the petitioner was now being posted at Guwahati. 7. Mr. Balendu Shekhar, learn