ASHOK GALOTH vs SALES TAX OFFICER CLASS II AVATO WARD 61 ZONE 5 DELHI & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~64 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 21st July, 2025 + W.P.(C) 10384/2025, CM APPLs.43108/2025 & 43109/2025 ASHOK GALOTH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia & Mr. Abhishek Anand, Advs. (M:9810371417) versus SALES TAX OFFICER CLASS II AVATO WARD 61 ZONE 5 DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Urvi Mohan, Panel Counsel, Civil, GNCTD/R-1. Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Singh, Adv. for R-2. (M:9667050278) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral) 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. CM APPL.43109/2025 (for exemption) 2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 10384/2025 & CM APPL.43108/2025 (for interim order) 3. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, challenging the Show Cause Notice dated 8th December, 2023 (hereinafter, ‘the SCN’) pertaining to the Financial Year 2018-19, as also the consequent order dated 27th April, 2024 passed by the office of Sales Tax Officer Class II/ AVATO, Delhi (hereinafter, ‘the impugned order’). 4. Further, the petition also challenges Notification No.56/2023-Central W.P.(C) 10384/2025 Page 1 of 9 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:RAHUL Signing Date:24.07.2025 11:13:30 Tax dated 28th December, 2023, Notification No. 56/2023-State Tax dated 11th July, 2024, Notification No.09/2023-Central Tax dated 31st March, 2023 as also Notification No. 09/2023-State Tax dated 22nd June, 2023 (hereinafter ‘impugned notifications’). 5. The validity of the impugned notifications was under consideration before this Court in a batch of petitions with the lead petition being W.P.(C) 16499/2023 titled ‘DJST Traders Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India and