ANKIT vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

Judgment text excerpt

$~72 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 16.07.2025 + BAIL APPLN. 2589/2025 ANKIT .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manish Sahay, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP for the State with SI Jatin, PS Tilak Nagar CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 219/2025 of PS Tilak Nagar for offences under Section 309(4)/309(6)/311/3(5) BNS and 25/27/54/59 Arms Act. 2. Learned APP assisted by IO/SI Jatin accepts notice. 3. On behalf of the accused/applicant, it is contended that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. It is also contended that the witnesses could not identify the accused/applicant in TIP proceedings. 4. After discussing with the IO, learned APP expresses, in all fairness, no serious objection to this bail application. BAIL APPLN. 2589/2025 Page 1 of 3 pages Signature Not Verified GIRISH Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally Signed KATHPALIA Date: 2025.07.16 16:35:30 +05'30' By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:16.07.2025 16:56:37 5. According to the prosecution case, on 13.04.2025 at around midnight, when the injured along with his friend was sitting near Kalu Paneer Bhandar, Subzi Mandi, three unknown boys came on a scooter and demanded money, and on being resisted, one of them announcing his name as Sagar @ Champa took out a pistol and forcibly robbed Rs. 5000/- from the injured and the complainant de facto. In the course of snatching money, the assailant fired upon the injured and then they fled. 6. So far as the accused/applicant is concerned, the allegation is that the vehicle used in the alleged offence by the robbers was recovered from him. Admittedly, the accused/applicant is not one of th