Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-07-30

ANIJAY TYAGI vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS.

Citation / case number
W.P.(C)-11180/2025 2025:DHC:6264
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
ANIJAY TYAGI
Respondent
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~68 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 30th July, 2025 + W.P.(C) 11180/2025 & CM APPL. 45873/2025 ANIJAY TYAGI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Yogesh Kumar Rajput and Mr. Vijay Kumar Dwivedi, Advs. versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Sanam Tripathi and Mr. Apaan Mittal, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA MINI PUSHKARNA, J (ORAL): 1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking direction to the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (“MCD”) to decide the representation of the petitioner made on 22nd July, 2025, so that the petitioner can comply with the order dated 15th March, 2025 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) 6522/2025. 2. It is submitted that the petitioner had earlier filed a writ petition being W.P.(C) 6522/2025 which was disposed of vide order dated 15th May, 2025, wherein, it was directed that the petitioner shall approach the MCD, which shall provide a list of deviations to the petitioner. The petitioner had also given an undertaking that upon the list of deviations being provided by the MCD, the petitioner himself shall carry out the demolition action for removal of such deviations. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:HARIOM SHARMA Signing Date:31.07.2025 08:59:24 3. However, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been unable to comply with the earlier directions of this Court on account of the medical exigency of the petitioner. 4. Attention of this Court has been drawn to the medical certificates and prescription of the petitioner to submit that the petitioner is suffering from back problem and has been advised complete bed-rest. 5. It is further submitted that the petitioner also got in touch with an architect and as per th

ANIJAY TYAGI vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. · Niyam