Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-07-29

AMBIKA TRADERS THROUGH PROPRIETOR GAURAV GUPTA vs ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER, ADJUDICATION DGGSTI, CGST DELHI NORTH

Citation / case number
W.P.(C)-4853/2025 2025:DHC:6181-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
AMBIKA TRADERS THROUGH PROPRIETOR GAURAV GUPTA
Respondent
ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER, ADJUDICATION DGGSTI, CGST DELHI NORTH

Judgment text excerpt

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 17th April, 2025 Date of Decision: 29th July 2025 + W.P.(C) 4853/2025, CM APPL. 22194/2025 & CM APPL. 22195/2025 AMBIKA TRADERS THROUGH PROPRIETOR GAURAV GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajesh Jain, Mr. Rishabh Jain, Mr. Virag Tiwari, Mr. Ramashish and Ms. Tanya Saraswat, Advocates. versus ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER, ADJUDICATION DGGSTI, CGST DELHI NORTH .....Respondent Through: Mr. R. Ramachandran, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Prateek Dhir, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA JUDGMENT Prathiba M. Singh, J. 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode 2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner- Ambika Traders through its proprietor, Mr. Gaurav Gupta under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, assailing the Order-in-Original bearing no. 74/ADJ-DGGI/DN/2024-25 dated 23rd January, 2025 (hereinafter, ‘impugned order’) passed by Respondent - Additional Commissioner, Adjudication (DGGSTI), CGST Delhi North. The present petition further Signature Not Verified W.P.(C) 4853/2025 Page 1 of 47 Digitally Signed By:DHIRENDER KUMAR Signing Date:02.08.2025 16:38:50 assails the form DRC-07 dated 4th February, 2025 issued along with the impugned order. I. Facts 3. The Petitioner is stated to be a firm dealing in metal scrap. It is stated to be a sole proprietorship of Mr. Gaurav Gupta and was registered under the erstwhile VAT regime. Thereafter, it migrated to the GST regime with GST No. 07AIAPG0187ElZQ. 4. On 3rd August, 2021, a search operation was carried out at the residential premises of the proprietor of the Petitioner as also at its sales office. Various records/files were resumed by the GST Department (hereinafter, ‘the Department’) from th

AMBIKA TRADERS THROUGH PROPRIETOR GAURAV GUPTA vs ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER, ADJUDICATION DGGSTI, CGST DELHI NORTH · Niyam