X vs STATE & ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:27.01.2025 CRL.REV.P. 1203/2019 X .....Petitioner Through: versus STATE & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner :Ms. Sunita Arora, Advocate (DHCLSC) alongwith Petitioner-in-Person. For the Respondent : Mr. Naresh Chahar, APP for the State. Mr. Chirag Jamwal, Advocate (Through V.C.) with Mr. Ajit Amar & Mr. Akashdeep Kakkar, Advocates for Respondent No.2 to 5. SI Mukesh Kumari (P.S. R.K. Puram). CORAM HON’BLE MR JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN JUDGMENT 1. The present petition is filed challenging the order dated 20.08.2019 (hereafter ‘impugned order’) passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-Special FTC (‘ASJ’), Patiala House Courts, 2. Briefly stated, a complaint dated 11.05.2018 was filed by the petitioner with the Delhi Commission for Women, alleging that one Mahesh/accused No.1, physically exploited the petitioner for 13-14 years on the false pretext of marriage. 3. It was alleged therein that the accused Mahesh took the petitioner to the house of Respondent No. 5 in Tughlakabad, claiming that he was the brother of the accused Mahesh and that he would help in convincing t