Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-01-31

WRIT - C No. 953 of 2025 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 953 of 2025 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 953 of 2025 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:6890-DB A.F.R. Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 953 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Rachana Soni Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rinku Verma,Ajeet Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Zafar Aziz Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J. 1. Heard. 2. The claim of petitioner under the Mukhyamantri Kishan Evam Sarvhit Beema Yojna has been declined by the District Level Committee on the ground of delay. As per the Committee the claim should have been raised within a period of one month from the date of death which could be further extended for another one month, meaning thereby, within a maximum period of two months, instead the claim was raised on 16.11.2018 though the death took place on 14.05.2018, thus, it was raised beyond the aforesaid period of two months. 3. However, learned counsel for the petitioner relies upon a judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court rendered on 11.03.2022 in SLP (C) No. 3978 of 2022 (The Oriental Insurance company Limited vs. Sanjesh & Anr.) to contend that such a condition in the scheme is hit by Section 28 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 as has

WRIT - C No. 953 of 2025 at Lucknow · Niyam