Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-01-06

WRIT - C No. 9 of 2025 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 9 of 2025 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 9 of 2025 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:788-DB Court No. - 1 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mohd. Subhan And 16 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Nagar Vikas Viibhag And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Suresh Kumar Upadhyay,Ashutosh Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Virendra Mishra Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Virendra Mishra, learned counsel for opposite parties no. 4 & 5. 2. Admittedly, the eviction notices have not been served on the petitioners as on date. 3. The learned counsel for the Nagar Palika Parishad prays that he may be permitted two weeks' time to issue formal notices to all the petitioners through registered post and in case the petitioners respond to the notice by filing their explanation within the specified time provided therein, necessary order shall be passed by the competent authority after due consideration of their explanation and order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioners as per law. The occupation of the petitioners of the shops in question shall abide by the outcome of the eviction proceedings. 4. With the afor

WRIT - C No. 9 of 2025 at Lucknow · Niyam