Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-01-28

WRIT - C No. 637 of 2025 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 637 of 2025 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 637 of 2025 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:5835-DB Court No. - 1 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 637 of 2025 Petitioner :- Lakhan Lal Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Urban Development Deptt. U.P. Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anoop Kumar,Sandeep Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Namit Sharma Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. 2. Sri Amit Kumar has put in appearance on behalf of opposite parties no. 2 to 5. 3. The factual dispute as to the calculation of house tax has been raised in the present writ petition against the demand notice contained in Annexure 1 to the writ petition to the tune of Rs. 23,15,117/-. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the annual house tax which was assessed against the building in question has been deposited on year to year basis which has not been accounted for while issuing demand notice. 4. Essentially it is a factual dispute which cannot be looked into in exercise of writ jurisdiction. 5. We leave it open to the petitioner to raise his grievance by raising all the pleas open to him on the basis of do

WRIT - C No. 637 of 2025 at Lucknow · Niyam