Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-01-06

WRIT - C No. 30 of 2025 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 30 of 2025 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 30 of 2025 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:795-DB Court No. - 1 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 30 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shiv Kumar And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vijay Kumar Yadav,Amit Kumar,Saurabh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Chief Standing Counsel for the State. 2. It is averred in the writ petition that the demarcation proceedings initiated by the petitioners have been decided by fixing pillars setting out the limits of boundary so far as the land belong to the petitioners is concerned. It is submitted that some portion of the petitioners' land has unauthorizedly been encroached upon contrary to his entitlement by the adjacent tenure holders. Once the boundary is settled by the competent court after following due procedure, there is no reason as to why the order so passed may not be implemented by the authorities for which the execution proceedings would lie before the court itself. 3. In case an application for execution is filed by the petitioners before the competent author

WRIT - C No. 30 of 2025 at Lucknow · Niyam