Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-01-06

WRIT - C No. 3 of 2025 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 3 of 2025 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 3 of 2025 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:746-DB Court No. - 1 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3 of 2025 Petitioner :- Virendra Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pradeep Kumar,Bhanu Pratap Singh Chauhan,Pramod Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. 1. It appears that obstruction in the construction activity carried out by the petitioner is on account of some proceedings initiated under Section 67 (2) and (5) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner has an opportunity of putting forth his grievance before the competent court where the proceedings under Section 67 (2) and (5) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 have come to be initiated in case proper reply is filed in the pending proceedings of which the notice is contained in Annexure No. 1 to the writ petition, the competent court shall proceed to decide the objections filed by the petitioner expeditiously in accordance with law. 2. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Order Date :- 6.1.2025 Pradeep/- Digitally signed by :- PRADEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

WRIT - C No. 3 of 2025 at Lucknow · Niyam