Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-01-08

WRIT - C No. 278 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 278 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 278 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:4003 Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 278 of 2025 Petitioner :- Gouri Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Km. Poonam,Rajesh Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sudhir Bharti Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the respondent no.2- Additional District Magistrate (Finance/ Revenue), Maharajganj to decide the case no.986 of 2023 computerized case no.D202305470000986 (Surendra Pathak vs. Gaon Sabha), U/s 67 (5) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 within stipulated period. 3. Learned Standing Counsel as well as learned counsel appearing for Gaon Sabha has raised a preliminary objection that since the petitioner is not party to the proceedings and, therefore, the appeal cannot be expedited at his behest. 4. In view of the same, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. 5. The writ petition is dismissed, accordingly. Order Date :- 8.1.2025 C. MANI (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.

WRIT - C No. 278 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam