Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-01-03

WRIT - B No. 3811 of 2024 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 3811 of 2024 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 3811 of 2024 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:868 Court No. - 49 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 3811 of 2024 Petitioner :- Karan Singh Respondent :- State Of Up And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Brajesh Shukla,Kartik Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Diwakar Prasad Tiwari,Ramesh Chandra Tiwari Hon'ble J.J. Munir,J. Heard Mr. Brajesh Shukla, learned Counsel for the petitioner in support of this petition at great length, Mr. Ramesh Chandra Tiwari, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no. 3 and Mr. Vibhuti Kant Tripathi, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. By the impugned order dated 02.09.2024 passed in Revision No. 197/202454131600000263, the third respondent's application, seeking condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act in moving the Revision, has been allowed and the delay condoned. The delay was of about eleven months. The Deputy Director of Consolidation by the order impugned has found the cause sufficient and accepted the explanation. He has ordered the revision to come up for hearing after condonation of delay. This Court in exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 226 of the constitution do not interfere merely be

WRIT - B No. 3811 of 2024 at Allahabad · Niyam