Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-01-03

WRIT - A No. 16905 of 2024 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 16905 of 2024 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 16905 of 2024 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:1434 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 16905 of 2024 Petitioner :- Keshav Kumar Respondent :- State Of Up And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anshu Chaudhary Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri S.K. Pal, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for State. 2. At the very outset, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel has raised preliminary objection and submitted that against the order impugned, there is remedy to file appeal before Divisional Commissioner under Rule 11 of the Uttar Pradesh Government Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1999, therefore, writ petition may be dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy, which could not be disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. Under such facts and circumstances of the case, writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to file appeal before Divisional Commissioner. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there is some delay in filing appeal, therefore, Court may please to condone the same and direction may be issued to the Divisional Commissioner to decide the

WRIT - A No. 16905 of 2024 at Allahabad · Niyam