Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-01-07

WRIT - A No. 15469 of 2024 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 15469 of 2024 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 15469 of 2024 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:3181 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 15469 of 2024 Petitioner :- Mahanand Tyagi Respondent :- State Of Up And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Akhilesh Kumar Ojha Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2. The present petition has been filed stating that petitioner has retired from the post of H.C.P. (Civil Police) on 31.01.2018. 3. It is stated that after the retirement, amount of Rs.1,28,159/- has been deducted/ recovered from the post retiral benefit which according to the petitioner is contrary to law. 4. Learned Standing Counsel argues that the recovery certificate has been issued on account of wrong fixation of salary. 5. I have considered the rival submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and perused the records as well as impugned order. Apex Court in the case of State of Punjab and others Vs. Rafiq Masih (White Washer); (2015) 4 SCC 334 while dealing with such dispute, had framed following guidelines:- "12. It is not possible to postulate all situations of hardship, which would govern employees on the issu

WRIT - A No. 15469 of 2024 at Allahabad · Niyam