WP(AT)/24/2021 of shaik Rahamad Vs The Commissioner of Prohibition andExcise Government of Andhra Pradesh

APHC010214642021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3459] (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION TRANSFERED FROM APAT NO: 24/2021 Between: Shaik Rahamad ...PETITIONER AND The Commissioner Of Prohibition Andexcise Government ...RESPONDENT(S) Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. DEVAKUMAR SALIKITI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner addressed a letter to the Registrar (Judicial) dated 12.12.2024, stating that he is continuing his service in the State of Telangana. Hence, the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and the Writ Petition (AT) has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition (AT) is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Interim order granted earlier shall stand vacated. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 02.01.2025 KAS 192 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM W