Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2025

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · 2025-01-29

WP/22651/2009 of CH.SURYANARAYANA Vs THE A.P.S.R.T.C & 2 OTHERS

Citation / case number
APHC010207992009
Court
High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Petitioner
WP/22651/2009 of CH.SURYANARAYANA
Respondent
THE A.P.S.R.T.C & 2 OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

APHC010207992009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3504] (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 22651/2009 Between: Ch.suryanarayana ...PETITIONER AND The A P S R T C 2 Others and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. ARAVALA SREENIVASA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VINOD KUMAR TARLADA (SC FOR APSRTC) The Court made the following ORDER: Despite the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’ today, there is no representation for the petitioner. 2. Sri Tarlada Vinod Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for respondents- Corporation states that in view of the interim orders dated 22.10.2009 of this Court, the petitioner was reinstated into the service and retired on 30.11.2011. He also brought to the notice of this Court that the very same writ petitioner filed W.P No.14066 of 2014 with regard to payment of retirement benefits, arrears, etc., and the said writ petition is pending adjudication. 2 3. Thus, by taking into account the above facts and circumstances, no further orders are necessary in the writ pet