Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2025

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · 2025-01-05

WP/22070/2016 of S.SATYA RAO & 09 OTHERS, Vs PRL.SECY., MINES & DEPT., HYD., & 8 OTHERS,

Citation / case number
APHC010056062016
Court
High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Petitioner
WP/22070/2016 of S.SATYA RAO & 09 OTHERS,
Respondent
PRL.SECY., MINES & DEPT., HYD., & 8 OTHERS,
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

1 APHC010056062016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3310] (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 22070/2016 Between: S.satya Rao & 09 Others, and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND Prl Secy Mines Dept Hyd 8 Others and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. MANGENA SREE RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR MINES AND GEOLOGY (AP) 2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 3. A S C BOSE 4. ARRABOLU SAI NAVEEN 5. N SRIHARI (Standing Counsel for ZPP MPP and GRAM PANCHAYAT) 6. GP FOR INDUSTRIES COMMERCE (AP) 7. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV (AP) 8. ELEVATED AS JUDGE The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr.M.Lalith Kumar, learned counsel, representing Mr.Mangena Sree Rama Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and it has become infructuous. 2. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stands closed. _______________