WP/11350/2013 of S. RAMANJANEYULU, CHITTOOR & ANOTHER Vs SUGAR COMMISSIONER & CANE COMMISSIONER, HYD

APHC010262402013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3457] (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE NINTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 11350/2013 Between: S. Ramanjaneyulu, Chittoor & Another and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND Sugar Commissioner Cane Commissioner Hyd ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K UDAYA SRI Counsel for the Respondent: 1. GP FOR AGRICULTURE 2. GP FOR INDUSTRIES COMMERCE The Court made the following ORDER: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The petitioners are challenging the notification dated 02.03.2013, which prescribes age qualifications for in-service candidates working in cooperative sugar factories for recruitment to the post of Chief Agricultural Officer. Consequently, the petitioner seeks a direction to consider their candidature for 2 50% of the posts in the category of Chief Agricultural Officer without reference to the age qualification. 3. This court, vide order dated 16.12.2013, granted an interim direction as prayed for, pending the writ petition. Considering the fact that the pe